<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://interactiveasp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Unit Testing Philosophy -- Code Coverage is meaningless....</title><link>http://interactiveasp.net/blogs/natesstuff/archive/2008/04/23/unit-testing-philosophy-code-coverage-is-meaningless.aspx</link><description>While I am a big fan of unit testing I often try to point out that Code Coverage tells us little more than “are there unit tests” not “are we unit testing”. The former indicates that the code is indeed being executed . The latter indicates that the code</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 (Build: 30417.1769)</generator><item><title>re: Unit Testing Philosophy -- Code Coverage is meaningless....</title><link>http://interactiveasp.net/blogs/natesstuff/archive/2008/04/23/unit-testing-philosophy-code-coverage-is-meaningless.aspx#22</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:48:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b80005ef-4071-4968-b08e-765d7d71b33e:22</guid><dc:creator>a random John</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A good overview of various testing paradigms:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://panela.blog-city.com/pycon_2008_managing_complexity_slides.htm"&gt;panela.blog-city.com/pycon_2008_managing_complexity_slides.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://interactiveasp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>